Bond-Heavy PortfoliosRanked by Performance
Bond-heavy portfolios allocate the majority of their weight to fixed income -- typically investment-grade bonds, Treasuries, or a mix of both. These strategies prioritize capital preservation and income generation over long-term growth, and are often suited to investors with a short time horizon, a low risk tolerance, or a need for regular income from their portfolio.
The tradeoff is straightforward: lower volatility and shallower drawdowns, but meaningfully less growth over time compared to equity-heavy alternatives. Bond-heavy portfolios are particularly sensitive to rising interest rates, which reduce bond prices, so the interest rate environment plays an outsized role in their performance. Investors considering these strategies should weigh the trade-off between short-term stability and long-term purchasing power.
| Portfolio | CAGR | Max Drawdown | Sharpe | Worst Year | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trend Following Bonds by Paul Novell | 7.4% | -8.8% | 0.48 | -4.0% | 1/5 |
| Big Rocks Conservative Portfolio by Larry Swedroe | 6.8% | -22.0% | 0.33 | -14.2% | 2/5 |
| The Larry Portfolio by Larry Swedroe | 6.6% | -20.4% | 0.33 | -15.7% | 2/5 |
| Late Sixties and Beyond by Burton Malkiel | 7.2% | -37.9% | 0.30 | -24.5% | 4/5 |
| Conservative Income-Tax Aware Portfolio by Schwab | 3.9% | -12.2% | -0.18 | -10.1% | 2/5 |
| Conservative Income Portfolio by Schwab | 3.9% | -11.3% | -0.19 | -9.8% | 1/5 |
Sorted by Sharpe ratio (highest to lowest). All stats backtested from inception. See methodology →