Simple PortfoliosRanked by Performance

Simple portfolios use a small number of broadly diversified funds -- often just two to four -- to achieve well-rounded exposure across asset classes and geographies. The philosophy is that most of the benefit of diversification comes from the first few holdings, and adding complexity beyond that point increases costs and behavioral risk without meaningfully improving outcomes. Popularized by investors like John Bogle, Bill Bernstein, and the Boglehead community, simple portfolios prioritize low cost, low turnover, and ease of implementation.

Because they are easy to understand and stick with, simple portfolios often outperform more complex alternatives in practice, even if they are theoretically less optimized. The main limitation is psychological: simple portfolios offer no mechanism for reducing drawdowns during market crashes, so investors must accept full market volatility in exchange for long-term simplicity. For investors who can stay the course, that is often a worthwhile trade.

PortfolioCAGRMax DrawdownSharpeWorst YearRisk
United States 60/40 Portfolio9.4%-29.7%0.51-18.3%3/5
Bogleheads Three Fund Portfolio9.2%-43.3%0.43-29.2%4/5
Lazy Portfolio by David Swensen8.7%-40.4%0.42-24.4%4/5
Bogleheads Four Fund Portfolio9.1%-43.7%0.42-30.0%4/5
Core Four Portfolio by Rick Ferri8.8%-44.4%0.40-29.6%4/5
Andrew Tobias Portfolio8.0%-36.4%0.38-23.8%4/5
No Brainer Portfolio by Bill Bernstein8.0%-40.4%0.34-26.3%4/5
Ideal Index Portfolio7.5%-40.1%0.31-24.6%4/5
Coward's Portfolio by Bill Bernstein7.3%-32.4%0.31-18.2%3/5
Coffeehouse Portfolio7.3%-34.1%0.31-18.5%3/5
Gone Fishin' Portfolio7.4%-39.5%0.29-26.0%4/5

Sorted by Sharpe ratio (highest to lowest). All stats backtested from inception. See methodology →