Simple PortfoliosRanked by Performance
Simple portfolios use a small number of broadly diversified funds -- often just two to four -- to achieve well-rounded exposure across asset classes and geographies. The philosophy is that most of the benefit of diversification comes from the first few holdings, and adding complexity beyond that point increases costs and behavioral risk without meaningfully improving outcomes. Popularized by investors like John Bogle, Bill Bernstein, and the Boglehead community, simple portfolios prioritize low cost, low turnover, and ease of implementation.
Because they are easy to understand and stick with, simple portfolios often outperform more complex alternatives in practice, even if they are theoretically less optimized. The main limitation is psychological: simple portfolios offer no mechanism for reducing drawdowns during market crashes, so investors must accept full market volatility in exchange for long-term simplicity. For investors who can stay the course, that is often a worthwhile trade.
| Portfolio | CAGR | Max Drawdown | Sharpe | Worst Year | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States 60/40 Portfolio | 9.4% | -29.7% | 0.51 | -18.3% | 3/5 |
| Bogleheads Three Fund Portfolio | 9.2% | -43.3% | 0.43 | -29.2% | 4/5 |
| Lazy Portfolio by David Swensen | 8.7% | -40.4% | 0.42 | -24.4% | 4/5 |
| Bogleheads Four Fund Portfolio | 9.1% | -43.7% | 0.42 | -30.0% | 4/5 |
| Core Four Portfolio by Rick Ferri | 8.8% | -44.4% | 0.40 | -29.6% | 4/5 |
| Andrew Tobias Portfolio | 8.0% | -36.4% | 0.38 | -23.8% | 4/5 |
| No Brainer Portfolio by Bill Bernstein | 8.0% | -40.4% | 0.34 | -26.3% | 4/5 |
| Ideal Index Portfolio | 7.5% | -40.1% | 0.31 | -24.6% | 4/5 |
| Coward's Portfolio by Bill Bernstein | 7.3% | -32.4% | 0.31 | -18.2% | 3/5 |
| Coffeehouse Portfolio | 7.3% | -34.1% | 0.31 | -18.5% | 3/5 |
| Gone Fishin' Portfolio | 7.4% | -39.5% | 0.29 | -26.0% | 4/5 |
Sorted by Sharpe ratio (highest to lowest). All stats backtested from inception. See methodology →