Tactical PortfoliosRanked by Performance

Tactical portfolios adjust their asset allocation in response to changing market conditions, moving between asset classes based on signals like momentum, trend, valuation, or volatility. Unlike buy-and-hold approaches, tactical strategies explicitly try to reduce exposure before major market downturns and increase it during recoveries. The appeal is risk management: a well-designed tactical system can meaningfully reduce drawdowns, which improves long-term compounded returns even if it occasionally underperforms during strong bull markets.

The challenge is that tactical signals are imperfect -- they can produce false signals that cause unnecessary trading, and switching to cash or bonds at the wrong time can result in missing significant upside. Most tactical strategies are backtested on the same historical data used to design them, which can make their track records look better in hindsight than they perform going forward. Investors should evaluate tactical strategies on their out-of-sample performance and the robustness of their underlying logic.

PortfolioCAGRMax DrawdownSharpeWorst YearRisk
Stoken's Active Combined Asset (ACA)11.5%-24.7%0.71-22.7%3/5
Global Tactical Asset Allocation 13 (GTAA 13) by Meb Faber9.4%-12.5%0.69-8.3%2/5
Quint Switching Filtered12.2%-26.6%0.68-15.2%3/5
Global Tactical Asset Allocation - Agg. 3 by Meb Faber12.8%-20.7%0.67-9.7%2/5
Global Tactical Asset Allocation - Agg. 6 by Meb Faber11.4%-23.6%0.67-8.6%2/5
Global Tactical Asset Allocation 5 (GTAA 5) by Meb Faber9.1%-11.3%0.66-4.8%1/5
Ivy Portfolio - Rotation12.7%-26.0%0.59-8.8%3/5
Three-Way Model by Ned Davis11.5%-24.9%0.59-14.7%3/5
Tactical Permanent Portfolio8.4%-11.1%0.58-6.4%1/5
Paired Switching by Lewis Glenn10.8%-30.8%0.52-23.1%3/5
Trend Following Bonds by Paul Novell7.4%-8.8%0.48-4.0%1/5
Ivy Portfolio - Timing7.3%-13.1%0.43-8.8%2/5

Sorted by Sharpe ratio (highest to lowest). All stats backtested from inception. See methodology →